Peer Review 3

Hi Nicole,
I did the same topic as you this week and I do enjoy the way that you critic Mr Gradgrind’s parenting and teaching methods. I do like how you relate this back to your own experiences and feelings towards this forced marriage. The use of the rhetorical questions does highlight the injustice that Mr Gradgrind has done to Louisa. The only thing that I would of done would of been to related it back to context of the work and the particular chapter that the marriage proposal does happen. Though, I do understand how that can be difficult due to it being a creative piece. Apart from that, I do like your response to Mr Gradgrind and look forward to more of your blogs. Riley

 

https://nicolewalshblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/10/blog-post-4-week-6/comment-page-1/#comment-16

Advertisements

One thought on “Peer Review 3

  1. Hi Riley, nice supportive peer review with a useful suggestion. But please note your grammatical errors (this is Gradgrind speaking!)
    *The only thing that I would of done would of been= The only thing that I would HAVE done would HAVE been [would have – is a verb in two parts: this is such a common mistake amongst young Australians that it may well come to be accepted as legitimate – in around 50 years…. who knows????]
    * related it back to context of the work and the particular chapter that the marriage proposal does happen. = related it back to context of the work and the particular chapter IN WHICH the marriage proposal does happen.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s