Week 6, Blog 4

Looking at these two poems describing a natural scene (“A Mid-Summer Noon…” & “Bell-Birds”, say what you think each poet values and how they differ in their appreciation and their expression


With the two poems “A Mid-Summer Noon.in the Australian Forest” by Charles Harpur and “Bell-Birds” by Henry Kendall, they explore the different aspects of the Australian landscape. While both poets describe the joy and beauty of the landscape, both perspectives portray the various ways that the landscape can be interpreted and allow themselves to show their gratitude and appreciation for the landscape as previously in the early days of settlement, the landscape was viewed harshly by the wider audiences such as traditional Englishmen and artists.


In the poem, “A Mid-Summer Noon in the Australian Forest” Harpur creates a peaceful atmosphere. In my opinion the silence of the environment is symbolic of Harpur’s awe and respect of the landscape as he states in the first stanza that “even the busy ants are found Resting”. The idea of everything being tranquil allows the audience to see the landscape from Harpur’s perspective. But in the second stanza, Harpur changes the pace of the poem as he completely focuses on one element of the environment, the Dragon-Hornet and describes it as majestic. This description of the beetle is very similar to the way Kendall illustrates the landscape on a whole. With Kendall’s description of the landscape in “Bell-Birds”, his tone seems to yearn to return to this environment as he reminisces of his childhood of being able to lose himself in the environment. Unlike Harpur’s second stanza only focuses on a single element of the environment, Kendall illustrates the excitement and energy of the Australian landscape as a whole with particular references to the sound of the bell-birds.


I do find these poems beautifully written but I believe that the poets over exaggerate the certain parts of the environment as Harpur states unrealistically that the environment is silent and also with Kendall’s description in the second stanza with statements such as “the thunder-bolts hurdle, They hide with their fear in the leaves”. Personally, I really appreciate their love for the Australian landscape but because their descriptions are so over the top, I find their works almost ironic because of the poets’ selection of the language that they use to describe the environment. With statements such as “Till rising in the sunshine higher, Its shards flame out like gems on fire” from A Mid-Summer Noon in the Australian Forest and “Struggles the light that is love to the flowers” from Bell-birds show that both the poets use very descriptive personification to show their appreciation for the landscape and that the language that is used is not completely unrealistic but it so drawn out from the truth.

Image from https://wangiwriter.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/the-australian-bush-calls/




2 thoughts on “Week 6, Blog 4

  1. Hi Riley,

    Reading through your descriptions of the poem I mostly agree with what you are saying. Some of your points maybe weren’t supported enough, namely your mention of the landscape being viewed harshly by people unlike Harpur and Kendall. Who are you talking about?

    I agree with your views on Harpur’s and Kendall’s perspectives and how they differ.

    I don’t necessarily agree with your conclusive statements about the poems however.
    I wish you would explain your views on this a bit more. Claiming that the poems are over exaggerated, or ironic you need to show us. Claiming that nature is not silent is insufficient and most people (myself included) can probably disagree that at times in the forest you can focus on one noise, the call of a bird or alike. Harpur stating that the silence of the other creatures except for the droning of the hornet does not literally mean nothing exists beyond the drone. This is merely a description of Harpur feeling and honing in on the Hornet using imaginative overtones.
    “[T]he thunder-bolts hurdle, They hide with their fear in the leaves” for me describes lightning striking trees and causing them to shake. As would be most notable with the shaking of the leaves as the bolt disappears into the ground through the tree… I find this particularly descriptive and not unrealistic at all.

    I really would’ve liked you to write more about how you found it over the top…

    But at the same time I would cheekily like to suggest getting outside into the forest more as I don’t really understand your hyperbole angle…

    Overall good work!



    1. Hi Andrew,

      Sorry for the late reply. I have taken your advice on about this blog and have done a few little changes to it. Thank you for stating that I hadn’t put enough evidence in because I have now hopefully made it clearer for viewers to read.

      After your comment, I did realise my opinion on these poems were very critical and harsh so thank you for that as well! 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s